- High Court serious comments on Hydra demolitions
- Where do you have the power to demolish the notice?
- How do the structures demolish without surveying?
- Did the Secretariat and Buddha Bhavan Buffer Zones?
- Judge who questioned the hydra authorities
- Orders
Hyderabad, July 4 (Namaste Telangana): The High Court has questioned how Hydra will decide on the construction of the FTL under the survey. Did the FTL and Bufferzone confirm the Tankbund’s Secretariat, Buddha Bhavan, Necklace Road, Prasad IMAX, etc. That is. If the demolition is done in a similar manner, the metropolis of Hyderabad will be half empty. SIET Maruti Hills Colony Welfare Association President CH Sadanandam and seven others filed a petition on Friday in the case of the SIET Maruti Hills Colony Welfare Association in Guttala Begumpeta on the issue of hydra demolitions and demolitions and demolitions in the name of illegal bore.
A bench headed by Justice Sevi Bhasar Reddy heard arguments. On this occasion, the jury erred in unilaterally demolishing at the lime pond. ‘What do you think of Hydra? Is Hydra any of the powers of the law? ‘ That is. The government has a policy to determine what is illegal and what is in place. It concludes that Hydra has no authority to demolish notices without issuing notices. It was made clear that the victims should be issued notices, examine the evidence near them and survey. After that, the FTL has revealed that there is a construction of the FTL and explain to the victims to take action. These were ignited. He has repeatedly ordered Hydra to implement the law, but the lack of changes in the affair, has been said to be ill. It warned that the consequences would be severe if Hydra was no longer changed. The jury made it clear that this was the last warning.
A policy for demolitions
The bench said the FTL had rules for the demolition of illegal structures. It is clear that the boundaries of the ponds, the FTL and the buffer zones are not to be demolished. ‘Pond boundaries should be based on the Village Map. And then the buffer zone and FTL should be determined. If the structures are found to be illegal then, there is also a way to demolish them. Notice should be given first. And then the explanation, the documents should be examined, and the demolition of the documents. What is the demolition of hydra at the lime pond without this? “How to do demolitions without issuing notices to the victims and conducting the survey.” Many times in the past, the FTL has not been able to demolish without confirmation, but it is outraged that Hydra has lost. The jury was deeply displeased with the Hydra saying that there were illegal bores at the lime pond and that their water was polluted, but that the water was being sold by the bridesmaids. In Hyderabad, it is said that the bores should not be unveiled illegally. As Hydra says, they have confirmed how they have been illegal bores overnight. Asked why they were taken to remove them. Did there be Borley throughout Hyderabad City, all of which are permitted legal? The bench questioned.
The arguments of both parties ..
Senior lawyer MV Durgaprasad on behalf of the petitioners said that hydra authorities are taking steps without issuing a notice. Pawan Kumar, a lawyer on behalf of Hydra, said that in the past, the High Court has been sold by borers by blocking the plotting of the plight of the lands. Recall that the state pollution control board has reported that there is water in the vicinity of lime cheruuu to disrupt public health. He said that if the lime pond is not restored, the houses of the residents will be affected. Durga Prasad recalled that the authorities did not conduct a survey and not even notices to the petitioners.
Should the judge responded to the arguments before taking further action on the disputed lands, the preliminary clause should be implemented to issue notices to the petitions and the victims? Hadra asked. It has been announced that it is continuing the status quo. He said that illegal bores and water transport vehicles can be seized and sieged. The survey was ordered to be surveyed as a permanent system for perpetuation of lands in Begumpeta in Guttala Begumpet. The hearing has been postponed to the 14th of this month. Until then, it has been revealed that the order has been continuing to demolish the demolition. If the hydra was found to have no controversy after considering the documents submitted by the petitioners in the Survey No. 12, 13 and Allapur Survey No. 31, the Hydra Pond was ordered to appeal to the High Court for permission for the restoration work.
Stop the demolition instantly
The court issued an interim directive to immediately suspend demolitions at the lime pond. Stay orders will be in effect for two weeks. The High Court has ordered the government to complete the survey to formulate a lime pond. The deadline for this is ten days. Survey Numbers in Begumpeta 12, 13, Survey No. It was made clear that the survey was issued only to the petitioners in the lands of 31. Spastam has been surveyed by the officials of the Revenue and Irrigation Departments within ten days. Similarly, the bores in the lime pond should be illegal or proper. Further hearing on the petition has been postponed to the 14th of this month. In the meantime, the Hydra and the state government have issued notices to file counters with their arguments.
Did the FTL and Bufferzone confirm the Tankbund’s Secretariat, Buddha Bhavan, Necklace Road, Prasad IMAX, etc. If the hydra demolition is being carried out in a similar vein, the Hyderabad metropolis will be half empty. Do Hydra have any powers of the law? What does Hydra think?
How can the FTL be officially founded without surveying the lime pond? The government has a policy to determine what is illegal and what is right.
The FTL should be diagnosed after the survey is issued to those who are there before. If there are illegal structures after that, the demolition should be demolished. Even then notices should be given to those in the land. It is evil that Hydra demolition is done without this.
